...And in truth,
the source of the phenomenon of lack of concern in the serious matter
of causing our friends' anguish, is the effect of two causes:
1. We love to
display our capacity to express our cleverness to such an extent that
we become oblivious t any sensation of the pain that the expression
can cause.
For there are sins
from which a person derives bodily pleasure - such as in eating
forbidden foods, when one does so with an appetite, or when one robs
and steals on account of his lust for money. But there are sins that
a person commits without deriving any material benefit, such as Sinas
Chinam - the hatred of another person "for free" -
when the other person did not do anything to provoke a desire in me
to take revenge, yet I nevertheless bear a grudge of hatred towards
him for no reason. Why does this happen?
In
fact, chinam -
חנם
=
does not refer only to something one acquires without payment.
Rather, chinam is
a derivative of the word chen -
חן,
grace [or, in this context, an intangible affitnity]. (The
final mem in chinam is
not part of the word's root, but is rather akin to the final mem
in reikam ריקם
-
see Ibn
Ezra Shemos 3.)
In other words, I have an intangible affinity to this character trait
without a reason and without a cause, its source being the yertzer
ho'ra imbedeed
within me that gives me an intangible affinity for certain sins. This
is also the case in regards to lashon
ho'ra and rechilus,
in which one has no pleasure independent of the intangible affinity
that he has with the sin...
A great man once
witnessed two talmidim disputing an opinion of one
of the Rishonim, each of them shouting at the other,
taunting and mocking, that the other had no idea how to understand
a Rishon, etc. Hee said to them: "You should know
that by now you have completely forgotten the words of that Rishon,
and your entire dispute is: 'Which one of you is the smarter one?' -
that is the entire disagreement!'"
Sicha #7,
זהירות
בכבוד חברים
Sichos b'Avodas
Hashem
R' Yaakov Y. A.
Meisels
is this your response to the satmarer comment?
ReplyDeleteif so, i dont get it. can you please be clearer?